Selective Abortion Would Have Stopped Adam Lanza
Keeping the whole safe from the genetically deficient should be the argument
Abortion as a safeguard against letting deficient human animals to even be born would have easily stopped Adam Lanza, since once it was confirmed his DNA was weak due to the Asperger’s, Nancy Lanza’s pregnancy would have been terminated, thus saving innocent lives from his amoral killing. Did you catch that?
You see, if the pro-Lifers would stop being so ‘oh, every life is sacred and unborn babies are pure and innocent’, we could have easily determined that the glob of tissue that would become Adam Lanza was defective and taken appropriate action to prevent his abnormal evil from seeping into Newtown, CT.
Abortion is not our enemy. It is a useful approach to making sure our species is not infected with lesser-than-perfect genetics. What the pro-Lifers call ‘murder’ is really a great preventative against future murders, and the case of abortion regarding Adam Lanza only proves this. If only women were forced to have their pregnancies under the watchful eye of those who want only the best for our species, things like this horrific murder wouldn’t have even happened.
Selective abortion, based on the criteria of intellectual and/or emotional perfection would have stopped Adam Lanza before he even had the chance to do what he did on Friday December 14th, 2012. The argument, if you can call it that, is not about guns since the Constitution guarantees private and legal gun ownership, but moreso about whether or not we, as a species, can afford to allow defective humans to join us in the real world.
Consider as well the financial burdens that we all must shoulder whenever lesser-than-perfect globs of tissue are permitted to be born. How much money can we continue to put into the mental health industry to make accommodations and concessions for those with Asperger’s, autism, Down’s Syndrome, mental retardation, and the like? Billions of dollars could be saved for other ventures, instead of being used to seek and help these deficient humans. Actually, those billions could be funneled into such organizations as Planned Parenthood, who have our best interests in mind, and want to make sure we remain pure as a species.
It really is the right thing to do. It is not cruelty to implement selective abortion. It simply makes sense for the good of the whole, to remove the defective from even being allowed to be born.
NOTE: This is a commentary from a pro-Lifer shedding light onto the horror of selective abortion, which is nothing more than Hitler’s failed purity agenda.
Source: Keeping the whole safe from the genetically deficient should be the argument
Founder of WR2A: We Are The Second Amendment, a grassroots effort to carry out the words of John F. Kennedy:
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."
I also am a member of The Firearms Equality Movement. Hear, hear!
Selective Abortion Would Have Stopped Adam Lanza
Keeping the whole safe from the genetically deficient should be the argument
Saved under Commentary, Health Care
Tags: Abortion, Adam Lanza, Asperger's Syndrome, commentary, moral, preventative, pro-choice
Abortion as a safeguard against letting deficient human animals to even be born would have easily stopped Adam Lanza, since once it was confirmed his DNA was weak due to the Asperger’s, Nancy Lanza’s pregnancy would have been terminated, thus saving innocent lives from his amoral killing. Did you catch that?
You see, if the pro-Lifers would stop being so ‘oh, every life is sacred and unborn babies are pure and innocent’, we could have easily determined that the glob of tissue that would become Adam Lanza was defective and taken appropriate action to prevent his abnormal evil from seeping into Newtown, CT.
Abortion is not our enemy. It is a useful approach to making sure our species is not infected with lesser-than-perfect genetics. What the pro-Lifers call ‘murder’ is really a great preventative against future murders, and the case of abortion regarding Adam Lanza only proves this. If only women were forced to have their pregnancies under the watchful eye of those who want only the best for our species, things like this horrific murder wouldn’t have even happened.
Selective abortion, based on the criteria of intellectual and/or emotional perfection would have stopped Adam Lanza before he even had the chance to do what he did on Friday December 14th, 2012. The argument, if you can call it that, is not about guns since the Constitution guarantees private and legal gun ownership, but moreso about whether or not we, as a species, can afford to allow defective humans to join us in the real world.
Consider as well the financial burdens that we all must shoulder whenever lesser-than-perfect globs of tissue are permitted to be born. How much money can we continue to put into the mental health industry to make accommodations and concessions for those with Asperger’s, autism, Down’s Syndrome, mental retardation, and the like? Billions of dollars could be saved for other ventures, instead of being used to seek and help these deficient humans. Actually, those billions could be funneled into such organizations as Planned Parenthood, who have our best interests in mind, and want to make sure we remain pure as a species.
It really is the right thing to do. It is not cruelty to implement selective abortion. It simply makes sense for the good of the whole, to remove the defective from even being allowed to be born.
NOTE: This is a commentary from a pro-Lifer shedding light onto the horror of selective abortion, which is nothing more than Hitler’s failed purity agenda.
Share this: